AcroMeta Group (SGX:43F): FY2025 Results — Revenue Weakness, Losses Widen, Cash Improves But Risks Remain

AcroMeta Group (SGX:43F) FY2025 Results — Revenue Shrinks, Losses Widen, Cash Buffer Up but Risks High

A plain-English, accounting-based walkthrough of AcroMeta’s FY2025 results, cash position and risk profile for Singapore investors.

Published: 30 November 2025  |  Based on: AcroMeta Group Limited FY2025 results announcement (SGX)

Key Takeaways (If You Only Have 30 Seconds)

• Continuing operations revenue fell 25% from S$5.69m to S$4.24m, mainly from a weaker maintenance segment.
• Gross profit slipped to about S$1.31m (−14%), but gross margin stayed around 31% (up from ~27%).
• FY2025 swung to a net loss of about S$4.3m versus profit last year, which had one-off gains from disposals.
• Cash & equivalents improved from S$0.88m → S$2.68m, mainly from the disposal of subsidiaries (LSI co-working lab).
• Net assets fell from S$6.87m → S$3.64m; NAV per share dropped from 1.99 cents → 0.93 cents.
• Core maintenance business is still modestly profitable, but corporate overheads and other segments generated a large loss.
• Overall: business remains weak, losses continue, cash buffer is better, but risk profile is high for conservative investors.

Contents

1. Big Picture
2. Revenue & Business Scale
3. Gross Margins
4. Profitability & Operating Expenses
5. Balance Sheet / Debt
6. Cash Flow
7. Segment Performance
8. Outlook & Management Commentary
9. Ratios & Trend Snapshot
10. FAQ
11. My Overall Take / Risk–Reward View

Quick Facts

Company: AcroMeta Group Limited

SGX Ticker: 43F (Catalist)

Financial period: FY2025 (full year)

Main business: Engineering and maintenance services, with a historical focus on controlled-environment projects (laboratories, cleanrooms).

Key geography: Singapore and the region.

Source documents: SGX FY2025 results announcement

1. Big Picture — Leaner Structure, But Core Business Still Weak

AcroMeta Group (SGX:43F) is a Catalist-listed engineering and maintenance services provider, historically known for controlled-environment projects like laboratories and cleanrooms. In recent years, the group has struggled with:

• weak demand and pricing pressure in its maintenance segment,
• competition from lower-cost rivals, and
• divestment of loss-making or non-core businesses.

FY2025 is the first full year where the Life Science Incubator (LSI) co-working lab business was fully disposed. This makes the group simpler to understand, but it also means that headline revenue has shrunk dramatically and now reflects a much smaller “core” business.

For fundamentals-driven investors, the key questions are: Is the remaining business model robust enough? Can it scale back to profitability? The rest of this breakdown will walk through the numbers with those questions in mind.

2. Revenue & Business Scale — A Much Smaller Core

Continuing Operations: Revenue Down 25%

Revenue from continuing operations fell from S$5.69m → S$4.24m, a decline of about 25%.

The reasons are straightforward:

• Maintenance segment weakened due to aggressive competitor pricing.
• Lower demand from some controlled-environment customers.

The maintenance business is recurring in nature, but the small scale and price competition make growth difficult.

Discontinued Operations: LSI Disposal Shrinks Top Line

FY2024 numbers included EPC and co-working lab revenue — over S$28m. With disposal of the LSI co-working lab, FY2025 saw only about S$233k in discontinued operations revenue.

In other words, investors must now recalibrate expectations: AcroMeta’s core continuing business today is a sub-S$5m revenue operation annually.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Imagine you used to run two stalls in the school canteen: one big noodle stall and one small snack stall. You sold the big noodle stall last year, so now you only run the snack stall. Of course your total sales look much lower. That is what happened to AcroMeta: the extra businesses are gone, and what is left is a much smaller “core snack stall”.

Analyst insight:

• The most important shift is not just the 25% decline in continuing revenue, but the absolute scale of the business now.
• A sub-S$5m revenue base makes it very hard to absorb listed-company and corporate overhead costs.
• Disposal of LSI removed large losses but also removed a significant revenue contributor; the remaining business now needs to stand on its own.
• Future investment analysis must focus on the continuing maintenance and related services, not the old higher-revenue structure.

3. Gross Margins — Stable at Around 31%

Despite weaker revenue, gross margin held up at around 31% (versus roughly 27% last year). Gross profit came in at about S$1.31m, down ~14% year-on-year.

This margin stability reflects:

• better cost control,
• lower subcontractor usage, and
• a more selective approach to low-margin jobs.

The positive here is that AcroMeta is not simply cutting prices to chase revenue at any cost. However, the small revenue base limits operating leverage — even healthy gross margins may not cover fixed overheads.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Think of each job as selling a box of cookies. Even though AcroMeta sold fewer boxes this year, the money it earned per box stayed about the same — maybe even a bit better. They were more careful about which boxes to sell and didn’t give too many discounts. The problem: there just weren’t enough boxes sold to pay for all the shop’s bills.

Analyst insight:

• Stable gross margins suggest some underlying pricing discipline and cost management, even in a tough market.
• Without scale, however, decent gross margins do not automatically translate into net profit — fixed costs dominate.
• Management’s more selective approach to low-margin jobs is rational, but it also means slower revenue growth unless higher-quality demand appears.
• Future recovery needs both: volume growth and margin discipline, not one without the other.

4. Profitability & Operating Expenses — Losses Widen

Operating Loss from Continuing Operations

FY2025 loss from continuing operations widened to about −S$4.47m (from approximately −S$3.61m previously).

Key drivers include:

• Administrative expenses up ~6%, mainly due to higher manpower costs and professional fees.
• Other operating expenses up ~49%, including deposit write-offs and higher depreciation of right-of-use (ROU) assets.

In short, the company’s fixed cost base remains high relative to its small revenue scale. Even with okay gross margins, the bottom line is still red.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Imagine you run a small tuition class. You pay rent, Wi-Fi, and a helper every month. Even if a few students pay you decent fees, the money might not fully cover all these fixed bills. That is what is happening at AcroMeta: the “tuition fees” from maintenance jobs are not enough to cover all the fixed company costs and older promises, so the business is still losing money.

Analyst insight:

• The widening loss despite margin stability highlights a structural scale problem, not just a one-year issue.
• Administrative and other operating expenses need either aggressive reduction or support from a much larger revenue base.
• Investors should treat this as a turnaround story, not a stable cash cow.
• Until there is a clear plan to resize overheads or grow revenue meaningfully, recurring profitability remains uncertain.

5. Balance Sheet / Debt — NAV Declines, Small Cash Cushion

• Net asset value (NAV): S$3.64m (down from S$6.87m).
• NAV per share: 0.93 cents (down from 1.99 cents).
• Bank loans: about S$0.95m.

Deleveraging has not occurred meaningfully, but the cash buffer is better than before. On a net basis, AcroMeta is roughly in a small net cash position (cash exceeding bank loans by around S$1.7m), though this cushion could be eroded if losses continue.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Think of NAV like the total value of everything in your room after paying back what you owe your parents. Last year your room was worth 2 dollars per “share”; this year it’s worth less than 1 dollar per “share”. You still have some pocket money and only a small amount to repay your parents, but if you keep spending more than you earn, that pocket money will quickly shrink.

Analyst insight:

• NAV erosion from S$6.87m to S$3.64m reflects that losses are eating into shareholders’ equity.
• The small net cash position gives some short-term breathing room but does not remove the need to fix profitability.
• With low NAV per share and continued losses, investors should not rely purely on “asset value” as a margin of safety.
• The ability to access funding in future may depend on management demonstrating a credible turnaround path.

6. Cash Flow — Better, Mainly from Disposal Proceeds

Cash & Equivalents: S$0.88m → S$2.68m

Cash and equivalents increased from about S$0.88m → S$2.68m, an improvement of roughly S$1.8m.

This was largely driven by:

• around S$1.8m cash inflow from the sale of subsidiaries (LSI disposal), and
• positive working capital movements in the maintenance business.

The core business itself generated only about S$0.3m of operating cash inflow — small, but at least positive.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Imagine you sold your old gaming console for cash. Your wallet suddenly looks healthier, even if your weekly allowance hasn’t changed much. That’s AcroMeta’s situation: most of the extra cash came from selling a business (the console), not from the day-to-day jobs (the weekly allowance).

Analyst insight:

• Cash improvement is largely one-off from disposal; it cannot be repeated every year.
• The core business generating a small positive operating cash flow is better than a cash drain, but the margin of safety is thin.
• Future years should be assessed on cash flow from continuing operations, not from asset sales.
• Without improving profitability, the current cash buffer could be consumed by ongoing losses and compliance costs.

7. Segment Performance — Small Profits in Maintenance, Big Losses Elsewhere

Maintenance Segment (Core)

Revenue from the maintenance segment decreased about 25%. Segment profit fell to roughly S$397k (from around S$448k).

While the maintenance segment itself remains profitable, its small size means it cannot absorb the wider group’s overhead and listed-company costs.

Others Segment

The “Others” segment recorded a loss of about S$4.44m, driven mainly by corporate overheads and exploration costs for new businesses (minerals, lifestyle segments).

These new initiatives have not yet materialised into meaningful revenue or profit.

Explaining it like you’re 11:

Think of AcroMeta as two shops: a small repair shop that makes a little money, and a big “ideas shop” where the owner is trying new things but hasn’t sold much yet. The repair shop brings in some profit, but the ideas shop spends a lot on rent and trying new products, so the entire business still loses money.

Analyst insight:

• The maintenance segment provides a base of recurring revenue, but at current scale it cannot carry group overheads.
• The “Others” bucket masks a mixture of corporate costs and speculative initiatives, making it hard to assess economic value.
• For the investment case to improve, either new ventures must start delivering revenue or non-core experiments need to be curtailed.
• Right now, the segment breakdown supports the view that AcroMeta is a turnaround-dependent microcap rather than a steady compounder.

8. Outlook & Management Commentary — Searching for New Engines

Management acknowledges that:

• Pricing pressure continues in the maintenance business,
• higher inflation in materials and labour is compressing margins, and
• new business initiatives in minerals and lifestyle segments have not yet produced results.

The group intends to continue seeking new business opportunities, but FY2025 execution did not yet translate into earnings. For now, the company remains in a “search and rebuild” mode with elevated execution risk.

9. Ratios & Trend Snapshot — Smaller, Weaker, Slightly More Liquid

A simplified comparison between FY2024 and FY2025 for key items:

Metric	FY2024	FY2025	Trend
Revenue – continuing ops (S$m)	5.69	4.24	Down ~25%
Gross margin (%)	~27	~31	Slightly improved
Net result – continuing ops	Loss ~S$3.61m	Loss ~S$4.47m	Losses widened
Cash & equivalents (S$m)	0.88	2.68	Improved (disposal-driven)
NAV (S$m)	6.87	3.64	Eroded by losses
NAV per share (cents)	1.99	0.93	Nearly halved

10. FAQ

Q1. Is AcroMeta financially stable?

Cash levels have improved after the LSI disposal, and the group has only modest bank loans. However, ongoing losses and NAV erosion mean investors must monitor the situation closely. Stability depends on whether the company can move back towards breakeven or profit.

Q2. Does AcroMeta pay dividends?

No dividend was declared for FY2025, similar to FY2024. Given the loss-making position and need to conserve cash, dividends are unlikely in the near term.

Q3. Is the core maintenance business profitable?

Yes, but only modestly. The maintenance segment generates some profit, yet it is too small to offset corporate overheads and losses from other activities. Group-level results remain negative.

Q4. Is this a growth stock?

Not at this stage. New ventures in minerals and lifestyle segments have not yet translated into revenue or profit, and the core business is not growing quickly. Any growth thesis would be based on a turnaround that has yet to be proven.

Q5. What are the biggest risks for investors?

Key risks include the small revenue base, high fixed administrative costs, execution risk in diversification initiatives, ongoing Catalist compliance costs, and strong competitive pricing pressure in the core maintenance business.

11. My Overall Take as The Accounting Investor

If I had to explain AcroMeta’s situation to an 11-year-old, I’d say: “This is a small shop that sold off one big side-business to get some extra cash, but its main shop is still not earning enough every month to cover all its bills.”

From an accounting-trained investor’s perspective, I would frame it like this:

• Business quality: Niche engineering and maintenance capabilities in controlled environments, but currently operating at a very small scale with weak bargaining power.
• Earnings quality: Loss-making at group level; cash improvement is mainly from asset disposal rather than recurring operations.
• Balance sheet: Slight net cash, but NAV is shrinking as losses accumulate. Cushion exists, but not huge.
• Dividend profile: No dividend and unlikely in the near future given loss-making status and need to preserve cash.
• Risk–reward: Clearly a high-risk, turnaround-dependent microcap. Any upside case requires a belief in management’s ability to scale the maintenance business and/or monetise new ventures.
• Suitability: In my view, not suitable for conservative, dividend-focused Singapore investors. More appropriate, if at all, for investors who consciously seek speculative turnaround stories and can afford to risk capital loss.

For now, I would place AcroMeta firmly in the “monitor only” bucket — watching for signs of stabilising revenue, consistent operating cash flow from continuing operations, and concrete progress (or disciplined exit) on new business initiatives.

About The Author

The Accounting Investor is a Singapore-based investment blogger and Chartered Accountant–trained analyst who enjoys explaining company accounts in plain English for busy working adults (and curious teens).

New here? Start with the Start Here guide, or browse SGX company breakdowns on the Companies page.

Disclaimer: This post is for education and general information only. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it does not take into account your individual financial situation, objectives or risk tolerance. Always do your own research or consult a licensed financial adviser before making any investment decisions. The author may or may not hold shares in the companies mentioned at the time of writing and is under no obligation to update this post.