How to Evaluate Dividend Sustainability (Without Being Misled by Yield)
How to Evaluate Dividend Sustainability (Without Being Misled by Yield) — A Practical Guide for Singapore Investors
A step-by-step, financial-statement-based method to judge whether dividends are truly sustainable — not just “high yield”.
Published: 15 November 2025 | Category: Investor Education / Earnings Analysis
Key Takeaways (If You Only Have 30 Seconds)
- Start with cash flow vs profit: dividends are paid with cash, not accounting earnings.
- Check Free Cash Flow (FCF): if dividends > FCF for long periods, sustainability is at risk.
- Payout ratio is useful, but only when cross-checked against cash generation and business reality.
- Dividends from leveraged balance sheets are fragile — rising debt and refinancing risk often come first.
- One-off gains can inflate profit and “support” dividends temporarily — but do not last.
- Business model matters: cash-generative businesses usually sustain dividends better than cash-hungry ones.
- Use the 3-Circle Test: Cash Flow + Balance Sheet + Business Quality.
1. Big Picture
Singapore investors love dividends — and for good reason. Dividends provide steady income, reduce dependence on market timing, and offer psychological comfort during volatility.
But one of the biggest mistakes investors make is focusing only on dividend yield. A high yield can be either:
- a gift from a strong business, or
- a trap from a weakening one
The difference lies not in the yield itself, but in whether the dividend is sustainable. If you care about long-term income, you must learn dividend sustainability the same way you learn how to read quarterly earnings: start with the statements, not the headlines.
2. Results Summary
Here is the disciplined process I use (especially relevant for SGX dividend stocks and REITs):
- Start with cash flow (Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow).
- Cross-check payout ratio — but don’t trust it alone.
- Stress-test the balance sheet (debt, interest cost, refinancing risk).
- Remove “noise” from profit (one-off gains) to judge recurring capacity.
- Understand the business model (cash-generating vs cash-hungry).
- Study dividend history and management behaviour.
- Overlay the macro cycle (interest rates, demand shocks, industry conditions).
If you want one shortcut, use the 3-Circle Test later in this guide.
3. Income Statement
The income statement tells you what the company earned. It matters — but it can mislead if you don’t inspect what sits behind “profit”.
The main dividend question here is simple: is profit driven by recurring operations, or boosted by items that will not repeat?
Be extra careful when profit (and dividends) look strong because of:
- disposal gains
- fair value gains
- FX gains
- one-off investment income
- reversal of provisions
These items do not reflect recurring performance. Recurring profitability is what supports recurring dividends.
If you get $10 pocket money every week, that’s dependable. If you get a $50 ang bao once, it’s nice — but you can’t expect it every week. One-off profit is like the ang bao: it can’t fund long-term “weekly pocket money” dividends.
- “Good profit” for dividends is profit backed by operating performance, not accounting revaluations.
- If dividend increases coincide with large one-offs, treat it as a caution signal.
- This is a core skill in SGX earnings analysis: separating recurring earnings from temporary items.
4. Margins & Profitability
Dividend sustainability improves when profitability is stable. A business with steady margins usually produces steadier cash flow — which supports steadier dividends.
Conversely, shrinking margins often signal:
- weaker pricing power
- structural cost pressure
- intensifying competition
- profit volatility (and dividend volatility)
If your school canteen sells a sandwich for $2 and it costs $1.50 to make, there’s not much left. If costs rise to $1.90, the canteen earns almost nothing. Low “leftover” money means less room to keep giving you “extra treats” — dividends work the same way.
- Stable margins usually correlate with steadier free cash flow (the fuel for dividends).
- Margin compression plus higher interest costs is a common “dividend pressure” combination.
- When assessing dividend sustainability, profitability is your early “business health” gauge.
5. Balance Sheet
A company with rising debt and falling cash flow cannot sustain high dividends. Dividends from highly leveraged companies are fragile.
What to look for:
- Net debt trend: increasing net debt raises the probability of future dividend cuts.
- Gearing ratio: rising gearing is financial strain.
- Interest costs: higher interest expense reduces cash available for dividends.
- Refinancing risk: large maturities soon may force management to conserve cash.
If you must pay back a big loan every month, you have less money for toys and snacks. When a company must pay more interest and repay debt soon, it has less room to keep paying dividends.
- Debt is not “bad” by default — but dividends plus rising leverage is often a warning.
- Refinancing risk matters because management may cut dividends to preserve cash ahead of maturities.
- In an environment of higher rates, leveraged counters become more vulnerable to dividend cuts.
6. Cash Flow
This is the single most important area for dividend sustainability. The key question is:
Does the company generate enough operating cash flow to support its dividends?
Many companies look profitable on paper but generate weak or inconsistent cash flow. This is why “income statement explained” is not enough — you must study cash flow vs profit.
What matters most
- Operating Cash Flow (OCF): should be positive and reasonably stable.
- Free Cash Flow (FCF): FCF = OCF − CapEx (cash actually available for dividends).
- Dividends paid vs FCF: compare dividends outflow to free cash generation.
Red flag: Dividends > Free Cash Flow for extended periods. This is usually unsustainable unless there is a temporary timing issue.
Profit is what you write in your notebook. Cash flow is the money in your wallet. If you keep giving away more pocket money than you actually receive, you’ll run out — companies do too.
- For dividend sustainability, free cash flow is the “truth serum”.
- Stable dividends supported by unstable cash flow often end with a cut.
- If CapEx rises structurally, FCF falls — and dividends become harder to maintain.
7. Dividends
Dividend yield is a number. Dividend sustainability is a system. This is where payout ratio and dividend policy come in — but with context.
Dividend payout ratio (useful, but don’t take it at face value)
Payout ratio tells you the percentage of profit paid out as dividends. Acceptable ranges (as a general reference):
- 40–70% for most non-REITs
- >85% can be acceptable for REITs (regulated structure)
Red flags
- Payout ratio consistently above 80% (non-REITs)
- Payout ratio > 100% (paying more than they earn)
- Dividends flat despite falling profit (signalling behaviour)
Always cross-check payout ratio with free cash flow. Dividends can be declared even when cash generation is weak — but it rarely ends well.
Yield is like seeing a big “discount” sign. It might be a real bargain — or it might be a sign something is wrong with the item. You must check the “inside condition” (cash flow and debt), not just the label (yield).
- Dividend sustainability improves when dividends are covered by FCF across cycles, not just in good years.
- High payout ratios are not “bad” by default — they are bad when cash flow cannot support them.
- When leverage rises, dividend flexibility falls. Treat this as a system, not a single metric.
8. Management Commentary
Dividend history reveals management philosophy. The question is not “do they pay dividends?” — many companies do. The question is whether management behaves consistently and sensibly through cycles.
Positive signs
- Stable or gradually rising dividends
- Sensible payout policy
- Cuts explained transparently and aligned with long-term health
Red flags
- Sudden dividend cuts with vague explanations
- Declared dividends despite weak financials
- Dividend increases during deteriorating cash flow
- Erratic dividend policy year to year
Dividend-friendly management is consistent, not overly generous. Over-generosity today often becomes a painful cut tomorrow.
9. A Simple Analyst Framework
Here is a fast way to evaluate dividend sustainability without being misled by yield. I call it the 3-Circle Test.
Circle 1: Cash Flow
- Is free cash flow sufficient to cover dividends?
- Is operating cash flow stable?
- Are dividends paid consistently <= free cash flow over time?
Circle 2: Balance Sheet Strength
- Is debt low to moderate?
- Is refinancing risk manageable?
- Are interest costs contained?
Circle 3: Business Quality
- Is revenue recurring and predictable?
- Does the business have pricing power and stable margins?
- Is the model cash-generative (or cash-hungry)?
If all 3 circles are strong → dividend is highly sustainable.
If any 2 circles are weak → dividend is at risk.
This framework helps filter real dividend compounders from dividend traps — especially in a market like SGX where high-yield stocks are common.
10. Common Red Flags
The “dividend trap” usually looks attractive on the surface (high yield), but fails basic sustainability checks underneath. Be cautious if you see:
- Very high yield (often caused by a falling share price, not improving fundamentals)
- Dividends funded by debt (or rising leverage while cash flow weakens)
- Falling cash flow despite stable profit
- Rising receivables and inventory (weak cash collection)
- High capex commitments that shrink free cash flow
- High payout ratio during declining earnings
- One-off gains inflating profit and “supporting” dividends temporarily
- Interest rates rising for a leveraged company (higher finance costs + refinancing risk)
A good habit: treat dividends as a cash allocation decision. If the business needs cash to survive or reinvest, dividends often get cut — even if management tries to avoid it.
11. My Overall Take as an Accounting-Trained Investor
Dividends are like pocket money from a family business. If the business earns real cash every month and doesn’t owe too much money, pocket money can continue. If the business is borrowing to give pocket money, it will stop sooner or later.
- What matters most: free cash flow coverage, balance sheet resilience, and a stable business model.
- What to ignore: yield alone, “signals” not supported by cash, and single-metric shortcuts.
- How this improves decision-making: you avoid dividend traps and build a more reliable income engine.
- Why consistency beats prediction: you don’t need to forecast rates perfectly — you need businesses that can survive different environments.
Dividend investing is powerful in Singapore — but the edge comes from evaluating sustainability calmly and consistently, not chasing high yield.
12. FAQ
Can dividends be misleading?
Yes. A high yield can come from falling prices or unsustainable payouts. Always evaluate dividend sustainability using cash flow, debt, and business stability.
Is profit or cash flow more important for dividends?
For dividends, cash flow is the key reality check. This is the classic “cash flow vs profit” test: dividends are paid in cash, not accounting earnings.
What payout ratio is “safe”?
As a general reference, many non-REITs look healthier at roughly 40–70%, while REITs can run higher due to their structure. But payout ratio must be cross-checked against free cash flow.
How often should I review dividend sustainability?
At least at each results cycle (quarterly/half-yearly), and whenever there are major changes in debt, capex needs, or operating conditions.
Is this framework suitable for REITs?
Yes. For REITs, pay extra attention to leverage, refinancing risk, and interest costs because these often determine DPU resilience in different rate environments.
About the Author
HenryT is a Fellow Chartered Accountant (FCA) based in Singapore and the writer behind The Accounting Investor. He combines professional accounting training, corporate finance experience and personal dividend investing to help everyday investors read financial statements with confidence.
Disclaimer
This article is for education and general information only. It does not constitute investment, legal, tax or any other form of professional advice, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any securities mentioned.
My sole intent is to help readers learn how to read financial statements and think more clearly about businesses. Please do your own research or consult a licensed financial adviser before making any investment decisions. I may or may not hold positions in the securities discussed at the time of writing and am under no obligation to update this article.

Comments
Post a Comment
Thoughtful, respectful comments are welcome. All comments are moderated to keep discussions meaningful.